.

Rethink Gun Control, Governor

From Gloucester Township to Newark, the gun ownership debate is tipping New Jersey leaders toward more gun control. Governor Christie and his political colleagues should reconsider.

Three police officers were just shot inside a police station in Gloucester Township. Earlier, two women were shot near Essex County College. New Jersey media is stepping into the gun control debate with greater vigilance because of the recent spate of gun murders.

On ABC's "This Week" Newark Mayor Cory Booker claimed that 34 gun murders occur every day in the United States. Politifact.org rated the statistic as "mostly true," yet Booker neglected to distinguish between gun deaths in self-defense vs. gun deaths perpetrated during the commission of a crime. His referenced statistic does not factor in where these gun deaths occur, whether in rural or urban areas, nor the role which the mass media has played in the spurts of mass violence in this country, or the diminished capacity of state mental institutions to house individuals with diminished capacity.

In the wake of these tragic shootings, the New Jersey Legislature pledges to enact stricter gun-control laws in a state which already has one of the strictest sets of gun laws in the country. One would expect the state legislators to exercise more restraint and discretion following the Sandy Hook Elementary tragedy, especially since policy decisions following a traumatic event yield unintended consequences without necessarily enacting the intended reforms.

Gov. Christie wants to advance gun control to stop these tragedies. He is showing his true colors, a gun-control advocate from his days as a federal prosecutor, most likely. No one should question his caring and concern for his constituents. On most issues, Christie leads from the right, and he is right. On the question of gun control, he is wrong.

This country certainly needs a serious debate about the gun violence manifesting in this country. Democratic Sen. Joe Manchin (WV), a gun-owner in a gun-owner's state with an "A" rating from the NRA, has advised that every issue related to gun violence be put on the table. Every issue. The saturation of violence in our mass media, but also the whipped-up hysteria from media report and response, must be included. The access to guns requires reviews and background checks as a measure of fitness. Still, the man behind the recent massacre at Aurora, CO, had no prior record of criminality or insanity.

The forcible institutionalization for the mentally ill for those with diminished capacity has diminished in recent years. The Fort Hood military reported their growing concern about the religious fanaticism of Army psychologist Nidal Hassan, yet he remained in practice long enough to shoot his colleagues. Before that massacre, the college administrators of Virginia Tech had possessed limited authority to incapacitate student Seung-Hui Cho before he unleashed his private arsenal on the campus.

Washington D.C. had one of the highest crime rates in the country, and also some of the strictest gun laws. When the Supreme Court struck down the inhibiting individual handgun ban in the nation's capital, the murder rate dropped considerably. Currently, Chicago has the strictest gun control laws in the country, and now holds the dangerous distinction of 500 murders this year. When the US District Court struck down the city's gun ban, the crime rate began to decline. Other studies, from Kleck and Gertz of Central Florida to the National Academy of Sciences to the Cato Institute, have suggested that gun control does not diminish gun crime, while great gun access does not lead to more gun deaths. Even brandishing a weapon without firing has discouraged criminals.

Despite the negative perception of the NRA, President and CEO Wayne LaPierre's points are well taken: "The only protection against a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with gun." Not more gun control but less will protect our communities from future assailants. Removing the "gun free zone" stipulations from our schools will make them less likely targets for potential murders. Proper reforms and compromise from public sector unions would help. The crime rates in Newark have climbed past 70 homicides, in part because of massive cutbacks in police. The Trentonian reported that crime rates in the New Jersey capital are soaring in the wake of police cutbacks, as well.

In the absence of police support, the notion that more gun control will protect New Jersey residents is just plain ludicrous. Holding back the "good guys" from possessing firearms will not prevent the "bad guys" from holding them up. Gov. Christie, Mayor Cory Booker, and the New Jersey Legislature must rethink their response to gun violence. Gov. Christie's charge that police and fire unions refused to negotiate lower pay and pensions needs further scrutiny. Public officials need to step up and give their communities a break.

Impulsive political reforms in response to raw emotion or cultural misinformation will only exacerbate the gun violence which impacts communities without warning and without remorse. Local community leaders need to demand their right to bear arms, and demand that their local peace officers assist Trenton, Newark, and the state government with the budget demands facing everyone in New Jersey.

This post is contributed by a community member. The views expressed in this blog are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Patch Media Corporation. Everyone is welcome to submit a post to Patch. If you'd like to post a blog, go here to get started.

Joe R January 02, 2013 at 02:39 PM
More from right wing, Bush appointed, gun owning judge Larry Burns: "There is just no reason civilians need to own assault weapons and high-capacity magazines. Gun enthusiasts can still have their venison chili, shoot for sport and competition, and make a home invader flee for his life without pretending they are a part of the SEAL team that took out Osama bin Laden. It speaks horribly of the public discourse in this country that talking about gun reform in the wake of a mass shooting is regarded as inappropriate or as politicizing the tragedy." and "Congress must reinstate and toughen the ban on assault weapons and high-capacity magazines."
Paul J. DiBartolo January 03, 2013 at 07:52 PM
Joe R., if you're still reading...please help us all understand the rationale of the 2nd Amendment. Was it instituted so people would have the ability to hunt? Was it instituted so people could defend themselves against home invaders? Was it instituted so the people could defend themselves against an invading army? None of the above are true. So, what was the rationale for the 2nd Amendment? Do you know...Joe?
Schu January 05, 2013 at 05:33 PM
The lowest crime rates are in the areas with the highest firearm ownership by law abiding citizens. On the other hand, the areas with the highest murder rates have the most restrictive laws, etc Detroit, Chicago, LA.
Arthur Christopher Schaper January 05, 2013 at 11:48 PM
Thank you, Schu. I liked the joke about disarming and disbanding the Secret Service, too. Ha! Ha!
Arthur Christopher Schaper January 06, 2013 at 12:20 AM
Governor Christie, the headline speaker at the Republican National Convention, declared: "Real leaders do not follow polls. They change polls." The voting constituency may be 2-to-1 Democratic, but Christie should allow enact more gun ownership in his state. The voters may not like it, at first, but then he can argue thoughout the year that the declining crime rate is a direct result of his going against the popular or political grain and permitting more guns on the street.

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »