.

Chip Kelly Wrong Fit for Eagles

Chip Kelly ran a fad PAC-10 offense with some success in the NCAA, but unless he has some new, NFL-ready scheme, his tenure could be a short one in Philadelphia.

The Eagles on Wednesday announced the shocking hire of Chip Kelly to be the next head coach in Philadelphia.

My first reaction is one of abject disappointment. In my opinion, intelligent Eagles fans all breathed a sigh of relief a couple weeks ago when Kelly ended his flirtation with the Eagles to return to Oregon.

At that point, the path was seemingly paved for Gus Bradley to be the next Eagles Head Coach. He seemed to be the best choice: tough, no-nonsense and NFL battle-tested, Bradley would have brought passion and NFL experience to the Eagles.

Chip Kelly will either revolutionize the NFL or fall flat on his face. The likelihood of him being successful is about 10 percent—leaving a 90 percent chance he’ll be a disaster.

At Oregon, his record was 46-7 against the PAC 10, running his gimmick offense. In the college arena, his offense was impressive to watch. It was relentless, attacking every chance it had. Its sheer volume of plays was astounding and beat opposing defenses to exhaustion and confusion. PAC 10 defenses.

When Oregon faced Stanford this season, its vaunted offense managed 14 points. The Ducks were 4-19 on third and fourth downs. When the frenetic Oregon offense was not working, it gave the ball back to the opposing team in about 60 seconds and forced Oregon’s exhausted defense back onto the field.

While running quarterbacks have had a bit of a resurgence in the NFL, there is no time-tested sample to show it will work in the long run. Kelly’s offense puts a premium on a tough, smart, mobile QB—not easy to find and a constant injury risk against NFL defenses.

If Kelly’s offense won’t work in the NFL, which seems likely, then what credentials does he have that justify him becoming a head coach in the NFL? None. Without that, he’s just a guy from the PAC 10.

If the hire of Kelly makes the Eagles retain Mike Vick to run his offense, this hiring is an unmitigated disaster. Vick is a small, timid quarterback at this point. At 33, he has become so brittle, he will last about two games running Kelly’s offense.

Could Kelly be successful? He may be so innovative that he can adapt to the NFL and create another offensive system that is conducive to the NFL game and will work at this level like his gimmick offense worked in the college game. This assumption seems to be a longshot.

In my opinion, Andy Reid did a lot of great things for the Eagles, but it was time for him to go. With the Eagles having jettisoned Reid, fans craved a return to defensive, physical football, as opposed to Reid’s pass-happy approach. Now, the fans are being given the new version of the run-and-shoot offense; a fad that flashes bright for a short time, then is dismantled by the rest of the NFL in short order.

This hire seems to signal the end of Nick Foles’ chance to become the Eagles long-term starting quarterback. Foles earned that chance, but continuing with him seems to be akin to trying to fit a square peg into a round hole.

If an NFL team is trying to sell a college coach to its fan base, it should be a guy who’s been astoundingly successful at the college level. If Nick Saban was the guy, it would be much more legitimate. He has conquered college football in the SEC. Chip Kelly has had four good years at Oregon in the much lower-level PAC-10.

Jim Harbaugh would be the obvious counter-argument; however, his success is a rarity and, no doubt, his 14 years as an NFL quarterback have been an important contributor.

Lurie, Roseman and Don Smolenski are the only people who were privy to Kelly’s presentation in their nine-hour interview. Each is an intelligent, successful guy and Lurie’s two previous hires—Ray Rhodes, and moreso, Andy Reid—have been good choices in their totality. Kelly obviously told the Eagles brass what they wanted to hear and they have earned some credibility in the arena of hiring head coaches.

That being said, hiring Kelly seems more of a risk than the likelihood of any possible rewards warrants. As a diehard Eagles fan, I sincerely hope I look back and eat these words. I will do so happily.

I do not think that will happen because I think this hiring has disaster written all over it. 

This post is contributed by a community member. The views expressed in this blog are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Patch Media Corporation. Everyone is welcome to submit a post to Patch. If you'd like to post a blog, go here to get started.

Jeem January 21, 2013 at 11:26 AM
You can make a case for negativity no matter who the birds hired. I personally would like to give the guy a chance before I determine he is the "wrong fit." Let him coach at least a couple games before making that statement. Your point was that Kelly has no nfl coaching experience. Well Jim did not either and John was a ST coach. Both were unconventional hires. Much like Chip.
Jeem January 21, 2013 at 11:28 AM
And I am happy they did not hire the other options. The only guy I would say I might have considered more was Bradley. But he is no lock to be great either.
Mike Diviney January 21, 2013 at 09:57 PM
Again, there's no sense in me writing a piece saying, I will give my opinion on Chip Kelly after I see how he does. I qualified it enough by saying I'm giving it a chance and I think he's got a chance, I'd just prefer a guy with NFL experience.
Mike Diviney January 21, 2013 at 09:58 PM
Agreed that Bradley is the only other candidate I really liked and no there are no locks until they've done it.
Bo January 21, 2013 at 10:25 PM
When Jim Harabagh asks which 9ers player, and however he'll ask or demand these players to do whatever in practice and or games there is an all important built in level of respect because he's successfully played the game at NFL level, and all his players know that. This is simply the culture of the sport, this league, where grown men get paid great money to play a very physically demanding sport. This isn't college football, where the threshold for pain and pushing your physical limits has lower expectations. Chip will never have that so in a sense he has to be that much better a communicator and an Xs and Os guy, cause he could much more quickly be shut out by whatever players, using whatever tactics he uses to motivate and teach. Jim Harbaugh, DID have HC experience before leading Stanford to 1 maybe 2 BCS games. Least we forget that however good Jim Harbaugh was, and though he might not have been the best HC in his first go-around, Mike Singletary played an important part in shaping, disciplining and molding that team to then arrive at what appears to be a bit more of a players coach in Jim Harbaugh. There's the converse a guy who was so good, better than Jim, that his personal expectations of what success is and how to achieve it, will never coincide with his players. Once Mike finds that balance he'll come back a better HC or DC.

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »