.

Gentek Answers County Police Question

Councilwoman Michelle Gentek, a candidate for Camden County freeholder, responds to questions about her position on a countywide police force.

Councilwoman Michelle Gentek says Gloucester Township will not be joining the proposed Camden County police force.

"Gloucester Township will not opt in to the program," she said Tuesday. "We will not opt in."

But the Democratic candidate for county freeholder feels the Camden County Police Department Metro Division, which county officials appear primed to launch for Camden City sooner rather than later, is very much needed.

Gentek pointed to Camden's record number of homicides in July. She pointed to the fact that Camden's current 270-member police force would be bolstered to more than 400 officers under the plan. And she pointed to figures that suggest that, on any given day, 30 percent of police officers scheduled to be working don't show up for duty, for one reason or another.

"This is something that Camden City needs. As a county, you can't let that city in your county fall apart. Something has to be done. ... They deserve help. They should not have to live in fear of not being protected," she said. "Everyone has the right in the county to be protected. This is a great, innovative way for Camden to be protected."

Gentek was among a handful of Township Council members who declined to respond Monday night to public questioning seeking individual members' opinions about the proposed countywide police force. 

"Do you support the idea of a Camden County Metro Police Department? Yes or no?" Gloucester City resident John Schmidt asked. "It's been out there. I think you all know what it is. I know what you (Council President Glen Bianchini) have stated before. And I'm not asking for the township's overall opinion. I'm asking for your individual opinion, as an elected official in a town in the county of Camden."

Linda Musser, a 2012 Republican Council candidate, was more direct, going right at Gentek.

"What is Mrs. Gentek's position? She's running for freeholder. Does she have a different position as a freeholder candidate as she would a councilwoman?" she asked. "As a taxpayer, I have a right to know what someone's position is. It's my tax dollar."

Schmidt and Musser urged Council members to attend Thursday's freeholder meeting in Magnolia to join police unions in, as Schmidt put it, saying "we want none of it in our town and none of it in our county."

Republicans in Gloucester Township Camden County have rallied around opposition to the county police force, which is being pushed by the all-Democrat freeholder board.

"Maybe it sounds elitist. But these are our tax dollars, and we're already paying a lot in tax dollars here and a lot in tax dollars (to the county)," Musser told Council Monday, referring to the possibility the township would lose its police force.

Freeholder Director Louis Cappelli told Collingswood Patch last week that "what's good for Camden City is good for Camden County." He was referring to the spillover effect of crime in the city.

“Camden will have police officers walking the beat, riding bicycles; policing they haven’t seen in decades,” because the lowered cost of a new contract will afford “more efficient work rules,” Cappelli said.

Gentek indicated Gloucester Township tax dollars will not support Camden's Metro Division police force, nor that of any other town that joins the countywide department—a point Cappelli has made in the past.

"It's not costing us—our town—anything for them to do this," she said. "They're getting all of their money from federal and state grants."

Councilman Dan Hutchison took exception to Schmidt and Musser's line of questioning during Monday's meeting.

"I don't think it's a good precedent to set by somebody coming up here and beginning to question each member on things that are not before the Council," he told Schmidt. "We could get a hundred different questions, where a hundred different people question Michelle, myself, Sam (Siler), etc. Now, you want to speak to me after this meeting? I've never turned you down. And I'lll give you my opinion on it. OK. But I don't think, quite frankly, this is the right way to go about it."

Hutchison later offered his personal support for maintaining Gloucester Township Police Department.

"I believe, personally, that a local police department that has knowledge of the streets in the town, of the people in the town, is the best way to police this town, so I support my police department," he said.

Siler offered a "no" when asked if he supported the countywide police proposal. Council Vice President Orlando Mercado referenced prior statements in support of the township police force.

Gentek, Councilwoman Tracey Trotto and Councilman Frank Schmidt did not address the countywide police proposal during the meeting.

Bianchini reiterated the position of support for local police he offered a few weeks earlier—in stonger terms this time.

"We believe in our police department. We're supporting our police department. There will not be anybody patrolling our streets but Gloucester Township Police Department," he said. "The mayor (David Mayer) has supported that and Council has supported that also."

Schmidt, the Gloucester City resident, later pressed Bianchini for a resolution to memorialize Council's support for maintaining the local police force—a request Gloucester Township Republican Municipal Committee chairman Ray Polidoro has made on several occasions.

"A resolution can be changed also, John," Bianchini responded.

A Camden police union leader told Collingswood Patch the county is planning to house the Metro Division in Blackwood.

Jerry McAllister August 14, 2012 at 09:14 PM
30 percent of Camden city police officers don't show up on any given day? Huh? In the private sector these individuals would not have jobs. So most would be hired in a metro and their attendance would be any better?
GTWatchdawg August 14, 2012 at 11:18 PM
A Resolution stands a whole lot stronger than council's "feelings". Send a message to the Camden County Freeholders. Council's words and Freeholder candidate and Councilwoman Gentek's words are just that. WORDS. When Council President lets her speak.
Paul J. DiBartolo August 15, 2012 at 01:14 PM
I find this article very, very interesting. >> Camden city has a 270-member police force that “would be bolstered to more than 400 officers under the plan.” A number of towns say they want no part of the plan, including two GT township members now (Bianchini joined by Gentek). So where are these 130 additional officers coming from? >> Ms. Gentek refused to comment at township council meeting, yet a day later she is willing to state that “…Gloucester Township will not be joining the proposed Camden County police force,” and "It's not costing us—our town—anything for them to do this…they're getting all of their money from federal and state grants." Which is it; are we just not paying or are we definitely not joining either? >> POINT: Is it not true that the all-Democrat freeholder board is in favor of this idea? Consider the fact that I have never observed any of GT's all-Democratic council members ever vote out of lock step on any issue. Now send Ms. Gentek, a lock-step voter from GT council, to the freeholder’s board and tell me she will not vote lock step there. Does Ms. Gentek care to assure us that she will vote against this idea if elected as freeholder? >> Finally, if this whole scheme is to benefit Camden city, and no one seems to have offered any evidence that it will benefit any other town, what sense does it make to put the headquarters miles away from the “scene of the crime” in Gloucester Township?
Publius August 15, 2012 at 03:59 PM
The only thing "elitist" here is Councilwoman Gentek. She claims this is a bad idea for GT yet is fully supportive of the plan for Camden. Which is it Mrs. Gentek, no respect for Camden Police or no respect for Camden residents?
Schu August 15, 2012 at 05:00 PM
If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it.
@xxLouA August 15, 2012 at 06:00 PM
this is all the usual statements. Typical politics, "Change" They are using shall we say twisted wording or whatever you want to call it. Paul, Publius, Schu, Jerry and GTWatchdawg all say the same thing, maybe a little differently. So what is it going to be? Somehow we all will be paying more taxes is one thing I see but guarantee they will continue to say it will be from federal and state grants.
John Reynolds August 15, 2012 at 10:48 PM
I'll bet her a gift certificate to her favorite beauty salon that any money Washington or Trenton doles out will dry up faster than her makeup, leaving the suburbs to pick up the tab for Camden's police force. Add this to the cost of our own police, plus the retired officers from our town and Camden, along with the 300 million a year the state kicks in for Camden's public schools, and who knows how much for their social services, healthcare,kickbacks,waste,fraud,incompetence, and sweetheart deals. Unless the county and towns figure out a way to streamline government, guess who will be paying for it? How 'bout recycling some of that BS into renewable energy. --
Sonia Santiago August 15, 2012 at 11:41 PM
She reminds me of Laura Paffenroth. They both look and act identical.
GTWatchdawg August 16, 2012 at 01:42 AM
The question was asked about when Michelle Gentek came up from under the council table, was she really taking a call during a council meeting? or was" someone" texting her before she spoke at the polling of council? YOU DECIDE http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_7MXbKABJuA&feature=plcp
Michelle Wolfson August 16, 2012 at 02:03 AM
I wasn't at the meeting, but that video showed absolutely nothing. It showed that she took a call. Which she stated was her child. There was certainly not one shred of anything in that video that should make anyone think otherwise.
Michael August 16, 2012 at 12:22 PM
She really doesn't know, she missed that part of the meeting while she was on the phone with her kids, and dealing with multiple text messages.
Michael August 16, 2012 at 12:24 PM
Come on Michelle, really? Watch the video again.
Roger Delgado August 16, 2012 at 12:33 PM
You are right Michelle the video does not show the content of her call. I think the point of GT Watchdogs comment is the suspicious timing of it right before her official comment period. It is unfortunate the trust level between the people and Council is so low it has come to this, but the timing of this quick call was suspicious. It could have been an innocent call from her daughter, but Ms. Gentek also didn't have to take it knowing the meeting would end in 5 minutes.
Michelle Wolfson August 16, 2012 at 01:46 PM
Yes Roger, very unfortunate! Personally, I have children, and when I am working they are not going to call me or text me unless it is important so I would not have waited to check the call either. Again, I see no evidence from the video that shows anything that proves anything. We have no idea what the content f the call was. I thought she seemed a little upset following the call. Perhaps, her child was not feeling well, or the dog ate the hamster, or the kitchen was on fire. We have no idea. I guess I haven't lived in Gloucester Township long enough for my suspicions and paranoia to rise to the level of some. And who exactly are "we" accusing of calling her to feed her information anyway?
Paul J. DiBartolo August 16, 2012 at 02:39 PM
I like the dog eating the hamster scenario;-) Here's the important point...I emailed Ms. Gentek essentially asking what I asked above. 1. Can you confirm that your position is that we will not contribute to this scheme with either money or manpower? 2. Can you assure us, as a potential freeholder, that you will not vote lock-step with the all-Democratic group (who are in favor of the plan) as you've done in the all-Democratic GT council? Do I think I'll get an answer?
Darren Gladden August 16, 2012 at 06:51 PM
I want to know why the live Feed was cut off and why is there not a video off it up .......Things that make you go Hmmmmmmmmm
Sonia Santiago August 18, 2012 at 02:40 PM
She is a total embarrassment to the township. Clueless, brainless, useless just like the rest of them. Useless
Paul J. DiBartolo August 18, 2012 at 05:32 PM
I have attempted to watch two council meetings in the past couple of months and both of them eventually became unwatchable...no video, garbled audio, audio drowned out by the A.C.?, and herky-jerky, stop-and-go coverage finally terminating in no feed at all. Are we paying somebody for this service?

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something